For the record, I'm with the reviewer here.
I mean, to everyone who shat on this review, what the fuck is your problem? The guy volunteers to write a review of the show and writes about what he hears. He's not there to stick his tongue up Trey's asshole the way most of these commenters seem to wish he would. Why? What on Earth is wrong with pointing out that they screwed up changes in Vultures? Or that on literally every show this tour, Trey has had trouble controlling his rig. On our dime. I was there on Saturday and Trey fucked up changes in Slave, which is much older and much simpler than Vultures by a long shot.
Here's the truth, part 1: They fucked up changes in a lot of songs. The truth, part 2: I still had a great time. It can be both and to suggest otherwise means you value different parts of the music. So fucking what? You don't have to read these reviews any more than the reviewer has to listen to last night's show again.